Comparison of quantitative parameters and radiomic features as inputs into machine learning models to predict the Gleason score of prostate cancer lesions.

In Magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION : The classification of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) suffers from poor inter-reader agreement. This study compared quantitative parameters or radiomic features from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET), as inputs into machine learning (ML) to predict the Gleason scores (GS) of detected lesions for improved PCa lesion classification.

METHODS : 20 biopsy-confirmed PCa subjects underwent imaging before radical prostatectomy. A pathologist assigned GS from tumour tissue. Two radiologists and one nuclear medicine physician delineated the lesions on the mpMR and PET images, yielding 45 lesion inputs. Seven quantitative parameters were extracted from the lesions, namely T2-weighted (T2w) image intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), transfer constant (K^TRANS), efflux rate constant (K_ep), and extracellular volume ratio (V_e) from mpMR images, and SUV_mean and SUV_max from PET images. Eight radiomic features were selected out of 109 radiomic features from T2w, ADC and PET images. Quantitative parameters or radiomic features, with risk factors of age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density and volume, of 45 different lesion inputs were input in different combinations into four ML models - Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest-Neighbour (kNN), Ensembles model (EM).

RESULTS : SUV_max yielded the highest accuracy in discriminating detected lesions. Among the 4 ML models, kNN yielded the highest accuracies of 0.929 using either quantitative parameters or radiomic features with risk factors as input.

CONCLUSIONS : ML models' performance is dependent on the input combinations and risk factors further improve ML classification accuracy.

Nai Ying-Hwey, Cheong Dennis Lai Hong, Roy Sharmili, Kok Trina, Stephenson Mary C, Schaefferkoetter Josh, Totman John J, Conti Maurizio, Eriksson Lars, Robins Edward G, Wang Ziting, Chua Wynne Yuru, Ang Bertrand Wei Leng, Singha Arvind Kumar, Thamboo Thomas Paulraj, Chiong Edmund, Reilhac Anthonin

2023-Mar-16

Gleason score (GS), Machine learning (ML), Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), Positron emission tomography (PET), Quantitative parameters, Radiomics