In Magma (New York, N.Y.)
OBJECTIVE : In the management of the aortic aneurysm, 4D flow magnetic resonance Imaging provides valuable information for the computation of new biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, accurate segmentation of the aorta is required. Thus, our objective is to evaluate the performance of two automatic segmentation methods on the calculation of aortic wall pressure.
METHODS : Automatic segmentation of the aorta was performed with methods based on deep learning and multi-atlas using the systolic phase in the 4D flow MRI magnitude image of 36 patients. Using mesh morphing, isotopological meshes were generated, and CFD was performed to calculate the aortic wall pressure. Node-to-node comparisons of the pressure results were made to identify the most robust automatic method respect to the pressures obtained with a manually segmented model.
RESULTS : Deep learning approach presented the best segmentation performance with a mean Dice similarity coefficient and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) equal to 0.92+/- 0.02 and 21.02+/- 24.20 mm, respectively. At the global level HD is affected by the performance in the abdominal aorta. Locally, this distance decreases to 9.41+/- 3.45 and 5.82+/- 6.23 for the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, respectively. Moreover, with respect to the pressures from the manual segmentations, the differences in the pressures computed from deep learning were lower than those computed from multi-atlas method.
CONCLUSION : To reduce biases in the calculation of aortic wall pressure, accurate segmentation is needed, particularly in regions with high blood flow velocities. Thus, the deep learning segmen-tation method should be preferred.
Marin-Castrillon Diana M, Geronzi Leonardo, Boucher Arnaud, Lin Siyu, Morgant Marie-Catherine, Cochet Alexandre, Rochette Michel, Leclerc Sarah, Ambarki Khalid, Jin Ning, Aho Ludwig Serge, Lalande Alain, Bouchot Olivier, Presles Benoit
2023-Feb-17
4D flow MRI, CFD, Deep learning segmentation, Multi-atlas segmentation