In Radiology. Artificial intelligence
PURPOSE : To investigate the impact of the following three methodological pitfalls on model generalizability: (a) violation of the independence assumption, (b) model evaluation with an inappropriate performance indicator or baseline for comparison, and (c) batch effect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS : The authors used retrospective CT, histopathologic analysis, and radiography datasets to develop machine learning models with and without the three methodological pitfalls to quantitatively illustrate their effect on model performance and generalizability. F1 score was used to measure performance, and differences in performance between models developed with and without errors were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test when applicable.
RESULTS : Violation of the independence assumption by applying oversampling, feature selection, and data augmentation before splitting data into training, validation, and test sets seemingly improved model F1 scores by 71.2% for predicting local recurrence and 5.0% for predicting 3-year overall survival in head and neck cancer and by 46.0% for distinguishing histopathologic patterns in lung cancer. Randomly distributing data points for a patient across datasets superficially improved the F1 score by 21.8%. High model performance metrics did not indicate high-quality lung segmentation. In the presence of a batch effect, a model built for pneumonia detection had an F1 score of 98.7% but correctly classified only 3.86% of samples from a new dataset of healthy patients.
CONCLUSION : Machine learning models developed with these methodological pitfalls, which are undetectable during internal evaluation, produce inaccurate predictions; thus, understanding and avoiding these pitfalls is necessary for developing generalizable models.Keywords: Random Forest, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Medical Image Analysis, Generalizability, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Model Evaluation Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Maleki Farhad, Ovens Katie, Gupta Rajiv, Reinhold Caroline, Spatz Alan, Forghani Reza
2023-Jan
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning, Diagnosis, Generalizability, Machine Learning, Medical Image Analysis, Model Evaluation, Prognosis, Random Forest
