Receive a weekly summary and discussion of the top papers of the week by leading researchers in the field.

In BMJ open

OBJECTIVES : Motor neuron disease (MND) is an incurable progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. There is a pressing need for innovation in identifying therapies to take to clinical trial. Here, we detail a systematic and structured evidence-based approach to inform consensus decision making to select the first two drugs for evaluation in Motor Neuron Disease-Systematic Multi-arm Adaptive Randomised Trial (MND-SMART: NCT04302870), an adaptive platform trial. We aim to identify and prioritise candidate drugs which have the best available evidence for efficacy, acceptable safety profiles and are feasible for evaluation within the trial protocol.

METHODS : We conducted a two-stage systematic review to identify potential neuroprotective interventions. First, we reviewed clinical studies in MND, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis, identifying drugs described in at least one MND publication or publications in two or more other diseases. We scored and ranked drugs using a metric evaluating safety, efficacy, study size and study quality. In stage two, we reviewed efficacy of drugs in MND animal models, multicellular eukaryotic models and human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) studies. An expert panel reviewed candidate drugs over two shortlisting rounds and a final selection round, considering the systematic review findings, late breaking evidence, mechanistic plausibility, safety, tolerability and feasibility of evaluation in MND-SMART.

RESULTS : From the clinical review, we identified 595 interventions. 66 drugs met our drug/disease logic. Of these, 22 drugs with supportive clinical and preclinical evidence were shortlisted at round 1. Seven drugs proceeded to round 2. The panel reached a consensus to evaluate memantine and trazodone as the first two arms of MND-SMART.

DISCUSSION : For future drug selection, we will incorporate automation tools, text-mining and machine learning techniques to the systematic reviews and consider data generated from other domains, including high-throughput phenotypic screening of human iPSCs.

Wong Charis, Gregory Jenna M, Liao Jing, Egan Kieren, Vesterinen Hanna M, Ahmad Khan Aimal, Anwar Maarij, Beagan Caitlin, Brown Fraser S, Cafferkey John, Cardinali Alessandra, Chiam Jane Yi, Chiang Claire, Collins Victoria, Dormido Joyce, Elliott Elizabeth, Foley Peter, Foo Yu Cheng, Fulton-Humble Lily, Gane Angus B, Glasmacher Stella A, Heffernan Áine, Jayaprakash Kiran, Jayasuriya Nimesh, Kaddouri Amina, Kiernan Jamie, Langlands Gavin, Leighton D, Liu Jiaming, Lyon James, Mehta Arpan R, Meng Alyssa, Nguyen Vivienne, Park Na Hyun, Quigley Suzanne, Rashid Yousuf, Salzinger Andrea, Shiell Bethany, Singh Ankur, Soane Tim, Thompson Alexandra, Tomala Olaf, Waldron Fergal M, Selvaraj Bhuvaneish T, Chataway Jeremy, Swingler Robert, Connick Peter, Pal Suvankar, Chandran Siddharthan, Macleod Malcolm

2023-Feb-01

Adult neurology, Clinical trials, Motor neurone disease, NEUROLOGY, THERAPEUTICS