In Ophthalmology science
PURPOSE : Accurate neural rim measurement based on optic disc imaging is important to glaucoma severity grading and often performed by trained glaucoma specialists. We aim to improve upon existing automated tools by building a fully automated system (RimNet) for direct rim identification in glaucomatous eyes and measurement of the minimum rim-to-disc ratio (mRDR) in intact rims, the angle of absent rim width (ARW) in incomplete rims, and the rim-to-disc-area ratio (RDAR) with the goal of optic disc damage grading.
DESIGN : Retrospective cross sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS : One thousand and twenty-eight optic disc photographs with evidence of glaucomatous optic nerve damage from 1021 eyes of 903 patients with any form of primary glaucoma were included. The mean age was 63.7 (± 14.9) yrs. The average mean deviation of visual fields was -8.03 (± 8.59).
METHODS : The images were required to be of adequate quality, have signs of glaucomatous damage, and be free of significant concurrent pathology as independently determined by glaucoma specialists. Rim and optic cup masks for each image were manually delineated by glaucoma specialists. The database was randomly split into 80/10/10 for training, validation, and testing, respectively. RimNet consists of a deep learning rim and cup segmentation model, a computer vision mRDR measurement tool for intact rims, and an ARW measurement tool for incomplete rims. The mRDR is calculated at the thinnest rim section while ARW is calculated in regions of total rim loss. The RDAR was also calculated. Evaluation on the Drishti-GS dataset provided external validation (Sivaswamy 2015).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Median Absolute Error (MAE) between glaucoma specialists and RimNet for mRDR and ARW.
RESULTS : On the test set, RimNet achieved a mRDR MAE of 0.03 (0.05), ARW MAE of 31 (89)°, and an RDAR MAE of 0.09 (0.10). On the Drishti-GS dataset, an mRDR MAE of 0.03 (0.04) and an mRDAR MAE of 0.09 (0.10) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS : RimNet demonstrated acceptably accurate rim segmentation and mRDR and ARW measurements. The fully automated algorithm presented here would be a valuable component in an automated mRDR-based glaucoma grading system. Further improvements could be made by improving identification and segmentation performance on incomplete rims and expanding the number and variety of glaucomatous training images.
Rasheed Haroon Adam, Davis Tyler, Morales Esteban, Fei Zhe, Grassi Lourdes, De Gainza Agustina, Nouri-Mahdavi Kouros, Caprioli Joseph
2023-Mar
ARW, absent rim width, CDR, cup-to-disc-ratio, CupDice, Dice score of the optic cup, CupIoU, IoU of the optic cup, DDLS, DDLS, disc damage likelihood scale, DiscDice, dice score of the optic disc, DiscIoU, IoU of the optic disc, Glaucoma, IQR, interquartile range, IoU, intersection over union, MAE, median average error, Neural network, RDAR, rim to disc area ratio, Segmentation, mRDR, mRDR, minimum rim-to-disc ratio
