In BMC cancer
BACKGROUND : Evaluation of treated tumors according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria is an important but time-consuming task in medical imaging. Deep learning methods are expected to automate the evaluation process and improve the efficiency of imaging interpretation.
OBJECTIVE : To develop an automated algorithm for segmentation of liver metastases based on a deep learning method and assess its efficacy for treatment response assessment according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria.
METHODS : One hundred and sixteen treated patients with clinically confirmed liver metastases were enrolled. All patients had baseline and post-treatment MR images. They were divided into an initial (n = 86) and validation cohort (n = 30) according to the examined time. The metastatic foci on DWI images were annotated by two researchers in consensus. Then the treatment responses were assessed by the two researchers according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. A 3D U-Net algorithm was trained for automated liver metastases segmentation using the initial cohort. Based on the segmentation of liver metastases, the treatment response was assessed automatically with a rule-based program according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volumetric similarity (VS), and Hausdorff distance (HD). The area under the curve (AUC) and Kappa statistics were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of the treatment response assessment by the deep learning model and compared with two radiologists [attending radiologist (R1) and fellow radiologist (R2)] in the validation cohort.
RESULTS : In the validation cohort, the mean DSC, VS, and HD were 0.85 ± 0.08, 0.89 ± 0.09, and 25.53 ± 12.11 mm for the liver metastases segmentation. The accuracies of R1, R2 and automated segmentation-based assessment were 0.77, 0.65, and 0.74, respectively, and the AUC values were 0.81, 0.73, and 0.83, respectively. The consistency of treatment response assessment based on automated segmentation and manual annotation was moderate [K value: 0.60 (0.34-0.84)].
CONCLUSION : The deep learning-based liver metastases segmentation was capable of evaluating treatment response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, with comparable results to the junior radiologist and superior to that of the fellow radiologist.
Liu Xiang, Wang Rui, Zhu Zemin, Wang Kexin, Gao Yue, Li Jialun, Zhang Yaofeng, Wang Xiangpeng, Zhang Xiaodong, Wang Xiaoying
2022-Dec-07
DWI, Deep learning, Liver metastases, RECIST 1.1 criteria
