In NeuroImage ; h5-index 117.0
Multisite machine-learning neuroimaging studies need to remove the differences between sites to avoid effects of the site (EoS) that may either prevent or fraudulently help the creation of prediction models, leading to impoverished or inflated prediction accuracy. However, we have shown earlier that current Methods Aiming to Remove the EoS (MAREoS, e.g., ComBat) cannot remove complex EoS (e.g., including interactions between regions). And complex EoS may bias the accuracy. To overcome this hurdle, groups worldwide are developing novel MAREoS. However, we cannot assess their effectiveness because EoS may either inflate or shrink the accuracy, and MAREoS may both remove the EoS and degrade the data. In this work, we propose a strategy to measure the effectiveness of a MAREoS in removing different types of EoS. For MAREoS developers, we provide two multisite MRI datasets with only simple true effects (i.e., detectable by most machine-learning algorithms) and two with only simple EoS (i.e., removable by most MAREoS). First, they should use these datasets to fit machine-learning algorithms after applying the MAREoS. Second, they should use the formulas we provide to calculate the relative accuracy change associated with the MAREoS in each dataset and derive an EoS-removal effectiveness statistic. We also offer similar datasets and formulas for complex true effects and EoS including first-order interactions. For machine-learning researchers, we provide an extendable benchmark website to show: a) the types of EoS they should remove for each given machine-learning algorithm and b) the effectiveness of each MAREoS for removing each type of EoS. Relevantly, a MAREoS only able to remove the simple EoS may suffice for simple machine-learning algorithms, whereas more complex algorithms need a MAREoS that can remove more complex EoS. For instance, ComBat removes all simple EoS as needed for predictions based on simple lasso algorithms, but it leaves residual complex EoS that may bias the predictions based on support vector machine algorithms.
Solanes Aleix, Gosling Corentin J, Fortea Lydia, Ortuño María, Lopez-Soley Elisabet, Llufriu Sara, Madero Santiago, Martinez-Heras Eloy, Pomarol-Clotet Edith, Solana Elisabeth, Solé Eduard, Vieta Eduard, Radua Joaquim
2022-Dec-05
benchmark, effects of the site, machine-learning, magnetic resonance imaging
