Receive a weekly summary and discussion of the top papers of the week by leading researchers in the field.

In Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society

This study evaluated the accuracy of synthetic computed tomography (sCT), as compared to CT, for the 3D assessment of the hip morphology. Thirty male patients with asymptomatic hips, referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT, were included in this retrospective study. Synthetic CT images were generated from 3D radiofrequency-spoiled T1-weighted multi-echo gradient-echo MR images using a commercially available deep learning-enabled software and were compared with CT images through mean error and surface distance computation and by means of eight clinical morphometric parameters relevant for hip care. Parameters included center-edge angle (CEA), Sharp angle, acetabular index, extrusion index, femoral head center-to-midline distance, acetabular version (AV), and anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles. They were measured by two senior orthopedic surgeons and a radiologist in-training on CT and sCT images. The reliability and agreement of CT- and sCT-based measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for absolute agreement, Bland-Altman plots, and two one-sided tests for equivalence. The surface distance between CT- and sCT-based bone models was on average submillimeter. CT- and sCT-based measurements showed moderate to excellent interobserver and intraobserver correlation (0.56<ICC<0.99). In particular, the inter/intraobserver agreements were good for AV (ICC>0.75). For CEA, the intraobserver agreement was good (ICC>0.75) and the interobserver agreement was moderate (ICC>0.69). Limits of agreements were similar between intraobserver CT and intermodal measurements. All measurements were found statistically equivalent, with average intermodal differences within the intraobserver limits of agreement. In conclusion, sCT and CT were equivalent for the assessment of the hip joint bone morphology. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Florkow Mateusz C, Willemsen Koen, Zijlstra Frank, Foppen Wouter, van der Wal Bart C H, van der Voort van Zyp Jochem R N, Viergever Max A, Castelein René M, Weinans Harrie, van Stralen Marijn, Sakkers Ralph J B, Seevinck Peter R

2021-Jun-30

CT, Diagnostic imaging, Hip, MRI, Synthetic CT